HISTORY OF ELK FARMING IN NORTH
AMERICA
by Ian Thorleifson, Executive Director,
Alberta Elk Association, (403) 460-9424
Reprinted here with permission.Many North Americans
think that farming deer or elk is a radically new idea. In fact, deer have been farmed for
thousands of years in various parts of the world. Written records describe intensive
farming techniques for deer in Mediterranean and Asian countries well before the birth of
Christ. In North America, elk (wapiti) were kept as farmed livestock in Pennsylvania in
the late 1800s, and in 1910, USDA Bulletin #36 noted the suitability of elk for farming.
In spite of this knowledge, the industry really did not develop until more recently.
The past 20 years have seen a dramatic pace of development
in the elk farming industry in North America. Before the 1970s, there were very few
commercial elk farms in operation. Game farms raised and sold live animals,
but these operations were more like zoos rather than commercial farms. The impetus to
begin commercial development came from contact with Asian buyers of velvet and other
products, and from the pioneering efforts of farmers from around the world, but
particularly New Zealand farmers. North American farmers realized that a large,
unsatisfied market existed for elk and the many products derived from those animals. The
challenge was to establish management systems and political environments that would allow
efficient and profitable production.
Management systems for farmed elk in North America were
not difficult to develop. Elk were native to most of the western and central half of the
continent and proved to be easy to domesticate and adapt to a farm environment. The New
Zealanders shared husbandry skills and knowledge with North Americans, with further
information provided by Europeans, Asians and South Africans. Most of these first elk
farmers were already accomplished stockmen who then adapted the techniques learned in
other livestock industries to the new strategy.
The first commercial farmers in the 1980s purchased
livestock from zoos and game farms or obtained their animals from the wild when permits
could be issued by the wildlife agencies. Once the high quality and desirability of North
American elk antler was established, markets for velvet antler were developed, primarily
in the Asian community. Another major market was the one for aged bulls for the
established hunting farms in the United States. The industry strengthened, and the market
for breeding stock boomed. This good fortune, unfortunately, precipitated the most
difficult times the industry has faced. Science had not kept pace with the development of
the the industry. Large numbers of live animals were moving all across the continent with
minimal control or testing. Techniques used for detection of various diseases and
parasites in other species were directly transferred to elk and other deer without
assessment of their efficacy or accuracy. As a result, tuberculosis was diagnosed in
farmed elk in the late 1980s. The discovery of these health problems was sufficient bad
news to the industry but the reaction of opposition groups was much worse.
The development of commercial elk farms in North America
had been strongly criticized by some wildlife, hunting and environmental advocacy groups.
The United States and Canada share a history of exploitation of native wildlife that
endangered the survival of many of those species. By the late 1800s, uncontrolled
commercial hunting had reduced the wild bison and elk to remnant populations in western
North America. Fortunately, a few forward-thinking people began taking steps to preserve
these remnants. Michel Pablo, a Montana rancher, and Samuel Walking Coyote from the Milk
River area of Alberta both captured and began raising bison. At the same time, prominent
conservationists Howard Douglas in Canada and William Hornady in the United States
stimulated some conservation groups, led by Theodore Roosevelt among others, to demand
that systems of wildlife conservation be put in place. These protection systems, built on
a philosophical base of public ownership of wildlife, are a source of great pride to many
North Americans. To their credit, these systems have served wildlife well. Populations of
most native North American species are healthy, providing viewing and hunting
opportunities to rival any other part of our world. Many passionate supporters of these
systems saw any commercialization of wildlife as a threat to the survival of the
protection systems and to the wildlife species themselves. Although many proponents of
conservation could accept commercial outfitting for trophy hunters, they opposed any form
of wildlife ranching. They predicted the introduction of dangerous diseases and parasites,
genetic pollution of existing stocks with imported and escaped farm animals, increases in
illegal harvest as legal pathways for production and sale were developed, and decreased
profile and support for wild populations as farmed populations increased. The appearance
of tuberculosis confirmed, in their minds, all of their predictions. This perception led
to a period of active lobbying in some jurisdictions for the complete eradication of all
farmed cervids and an end to the elk and deer farming industries.
In the face of this opposition, prices and demand for
breeding stock dropped substantially in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The industry was
hurt, but pioneering elk farmers were not at all prepared to quit. Several provincial and
state associations had been formed in the early 1980s, but these pioneers quickly realized
that national organizations were needed to focus their lobbying, research and industry
development activities. In 1990, Rush Johnson, an elk farmer from Missouri, organized a
meeting in Denver of 17 keen supporters of elk farming. That core group then recruited
other supporters, for a total of 35 who each contributed $2000 of their personal funds to
establish the North American Elk Breeders Association (NAEBA). The first NAEBA convention
was held in Kansas City in February 1991, with about 450 people in attendance less
than one year after establishment! NAEBA is now a powerful and well-respected association,
with over 1500 members at the beginning of 1998.
In the spring of 1992, representatives from all across
Canada met in Saskatchewan to form the Canadian Venison Council (CVC). The CVC is a
council of representatives of all the elk and deer farming associations in Canada. This
organization became the vehicle to carry the messages of the Canadian industry to the
federal government. CVC representatives met with the Canadian groups who were in
opposition to the industry at the time to discuss their concerns and to develop possible
resolutions.
Both NAEBA and the CVC have been instrumental in resolving
any difficulties the industry has faced. They have also accepted, along with many other
farmers, the forced destruction of thousands of their livestock as part of the measures
taken to rid farmed livestock of tuberculosis.
Although this was a difficult time for our industry, the
net result was a strengthening of every aspect of management and a hardening of the
resolve of North American elk farmers to see that industry succeed. Industry-supported
research continues toward improvement of disease and parasite detection and management
techniques. With these ongoing programs and the development and broad acceptance in Canada
of the Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Farmed Cervids, has come acceptance
and support of the elk and deer farming industry throughout most of North America. Most
provinces and states now have active elk and/or deer farming associations that work with
their local members in developing management practices and expanding markets.
Elk farming in North America is strongly based on the
market for velvet antler as a food supplement and nutriceutical. Production of unprocessed
antler is estimated to have surpassed the 150,000 pound (70,000 kilogram) mark in 1996.
Good markets also exist for meat and for hunting opportunities. These strong markets, plus
the limited availability of breeding stock, have pushed the prices of livestock to
unprecedented levels. These prices are now beginning to demonstrate the increasing
sophistication of the industry, as prices paid for lower quality stock are decreasing
while higher quality stock is selling for higher prices. As knowledge of productive
capacities and efficiencies increases, the spread of prices paid will continue to
increase, with more valuable genetics maintaining its price advantage.
Elk and deer farming industries have been established in
many countries around the world. Several species are raised, varying with the climate and
target markets. Population numbers are shown in the following table:
| Country |
Number |
Predominant Breeds and Uses |
1996 Velvet Antler |
| tonnes |
green |
| New Zealand |
1,400,000 |
Red deer, elk, fallow deer: venison, antler |
500 |
|
| China |
1,000,000 |
Red deer, elk, sika: antler |
200 |
|
| Russia |
400,000 |
Elk, red deer, sika: venison and antler |
180 |
|
| United States |
250,000 |
Elk, red deer, fallow, and others: venison and antler |
45 |
|
| Australia |
180,000 |
Elk, red deer, rusa, fallow: venison and antler |
10 |
|
| Germany |
150,000 |
Red and fallow deer: venison |
|
|
| Korea |
112,000 |
Elk, red deer, sika: antler |
40 |
|
| Canada |
98,000 |
Elk, red deer, fallow, whitetails: antler and venison |
45 |
|
| Mauritius |
60,000 |
Rusa deer: venison |
|
|
| England |
30,000 |
Red and fallow deer: venison |
|
|
| Eire (Ireland) |
28,000 |
Red deer: venison |
|
|
| Scotland |
20,000 |
Red deer: venison |
|
|
| Taiwan |
36,000 |
Sika, sambar, red deer: antler |
|
15 |
| Sweden |
35,000 |
Red and fallow deer: venison |
|
|
| Denmark |
30,000 |
Red and fallow deer: venison |
|
|
| France |
30,000 |
Red and fallow deer: venison |
|
|
| New Caledonia |
20,000 |
Rusa deer: venison and antler |
1 |
|
| Vietnam |
15,000 |
Sika deer: antler |
5 |
|
| Malaysia |
15,000 |
Red, fallow, and rusa deer: venison and antler |
5 |
|
| Thailand |
5,000 |
Sambar and red deer: venison and antler |
2 |
|
These population numbers include only the elk and deer
intensively managed on farms enclosed by high fences. They do not include extensively
managed deer such as the reindeer of Canada, Alaska, Siberia and Lapland, nor the hundreds
of thousands of deer and antelope maintained for hunting and meat production in Texas and
south African countries.
In North America, elk farming is well-established over
most of the historic range of elk, from Alaska to Florida, and Nova Scotia to Arizona.
Current estimates for numbers of elk farms and farmed elk total 800 farms and 35,000 elk
in Canada, and 1200 farms and 70,000 elk in the United States. The estimated value of the
livestock plus the dedicated facilities and fencing on these farms is currently over one
billion U.S. dollars. It is interesting to compare the wild populations of elk in North
America to these farmed numbers. Ernest Thompson Seton, one of the most recognized North
American naturalists of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, estimated that as many as
ten million elk roamed our continent at their peak of population. By the early part of the
twentieth century, only about 100,000 remained. Conservation efforts have restored those
wild populations to about one million animals in all parts of North America. Most of that
population growth has taken place in the last twenty years at the same time that
farmed elk numbers have grown to their current levels!
The future is very bright for the North American elk
farming industry. Opposition groups have been soothed by improved management and
production techniques. Markets which existed long before industry development have still
not been satisfied, and well-organized promotion and marketing campaigns will ensure that
market development continues. In a quick two decades, elk farming has become an integral
and highly profitable part of North Americas agricultural economy.
|